Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:43

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Nintendo Switch 2: The Ars Technica review - Ars Technica
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Big Match & Segment Announced for June 6 WWE SmackDown - Ringside News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is one fantasy you have never told anyone about but really want to do?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Nicotine Has a Bad Rap. There Might Be Some Very Good Health Uses for It. - Slate Magazine